|
snoopzen (September 6, 2008 at 6:42 pm)
Well, of course he had great reads. He can see everyone else's hand... no one can see his or anyone else's.If this isn't cheating, what would be?
titoartest (September 6, 2008 at 5:15 am)
this guy didnt cheat he is very agressive and he had great reads...i play everyhand too...its the only way u get 1st place
robtos1 (September 5, 2008 at 4:09 am)
the data was inputted into a simulator - the site in question was absolute and simple std deviation results have shown conclusive proof of cheating
Teeminusfourseconds (September 5, 2008 at 1:12 am)
the background isnt because the hand history was given to a person and that person put the hand history into a hand replayer and he videotaped it
CriticalBanana (September 4, 2008 at 3:17 pm)
It makes me laugh to think of all the idiots who think they know it all by telling people that online poker can't be rigged.Well it can, and this proves it has. The doubters win.
luiohh (September 3, 2008 at 4:15 am)
yeah if i had this ability i'd just grind out a decent living, damn what a wasted opportunity :/
drkglass01 (September 2, 2008 at 6:24 pm)
The site in this video is not absolute poker.What gives?
widoone (September 1, 2008 at 12:16 pm)
free poker & casino cash:pokergeld-orgpokergeld-orgpokergeld-org
BigEdgePoker (August 24, 2008 at 11:50 am)
You obviously have no idea what was investigated. More than 65,000 lines of hand histories and code were reviewed from this tournament. The "real cheats" were observing the table , not even sitting, and they were caught. The guy in second place was responsible for exposing all of this and he is a well known player.
vparikh87 (August 13, 2008 at 11:50 pm)
i dislike you | 
