|
thefloacist (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I wouldn't say a lot better, but the 1939 version was heavily influenced on the 1996 film.
Phoenixwrites (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Is it wrong to like both? It's a beautiful story--this version is heart-wrenching wonderful. Sure the Disney version has been numbed down, but to be honest, you don't see dark themes like that in Disney movies now. I think they're both fantastic movies.
koolbunny12345 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I saw about the first 10 minutes then i had to leave, but those first couple of minutes were amazing!
ysbaddaden2003 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I thought the cartoon was a total travesty of the story. Although no movie maker has ever made the story with the original ending of the book, too downbeat I guess.My favorite scenes is where the posit Esmerelda's unselfish prayer contraposed to the selfish prayers of the congregants, but she's the evil pagan. Later when Quasimodo is caring for her and is trying to hide his face. Charles Laughton seemed to have studied how people who are partially deaf sound when they talk.
sashsashsha (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wow, Maureen O'Hara looks amazing.
MerryChristmas2You (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
your right. for simple minds that can't truly appreciate art, stick to cartoons.
DarkGhostwriter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I agree with you
OpaqueOpal (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hmmm, the cartoon looks a lot better
MicetrapRecords (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Some EU countries spell it that way.
Chizpurfle52595 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Totally bitchin! But Quasimodo is spelled with a D not a T lik in your description. I must see this movie! | 
