footballskill19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

no u know nothing about footy.

footballskill19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

no. carrick is no where as good as hargreaves. not even close. hargreaves has a great work ethic + a killer freekick. carrick is too cautious.

aj1b (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

hagreaves = Juan Veron.injured.shirt no 4.Waste money.

aj1b (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Hagreaves better tahn carrick? last season whn he not injured, he cant compete wth carrick. he play postion lke winger and rightback. wht a waste mney. always injured.

zenyue86 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Carrick is too simple. Hagreaves is a better player.

kanchelskis144 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Carrick gets too much praise. Since he's arrived at United he has been far too cautious. His passing lacks the creativity and consistency it did at Spurs. He used to take risks, but now, in the main, it's very simple passes. I feel Scholes, Hargreaves and a developing Anderson all offer the side more than Carrick gives us. He's okay defensively, but if Hargreaves was fit for long enough to show what he can do, there's no question he'd be the first choice to partner Scholes.

footballskill19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

ok thats fair.my bad tho. i started the stupid arguement.

WKaliber1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

why are we arguing? both are great players, im just saying Carrick has something Owen doesn't and vice versa

footballskill19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

hargreaves can play right wing, right back, attacking mid, or defensive mid. he's a far more flexible player, not to mention a free-kick specialist. remember his strike against arsenal last year?

WKaliber1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Hargreaves won't calm down the play like Carrick can and doesnt have as good of a passing range and vision