biscuitsNgravvvvy (September 11, 2008 at 6:33 pm)

so many pidgeons in new york why people think it was doctored

chibangin007 (August 17, 2008 at 9:57 am)

that isnt a plane. lol. that looks like a retarded bird lol. listen to these idiot reporters trying to make us believe that image was real... lol! wow i cant believe that people still buy into the false story of planes hitting the towers. those images were FAKE!!!!

guitaristxcore (June 28, 2008 at 2:41 am)

Nothing doctored or undoctored about this video.The plane angled as it went in, light reflection caused it to blend in with the back ground, POS camera couldnt differentiate.Fastest birds in the world? Hardly. They flew past closer to the lense than the buildings were. Not a hard concept to grasp.

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (June 28, 2008 at 12:24 am)

OwGebpA97UM vs. l_MnCPxwKoY pax 5 video is real except for the fake wing drawn on

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (June 16, 2008 at 6:46 pm)

first impact on this video ...notice, the GREY smoke from wtc 1 is grey. and the object looks like a missle dredded up like a plane , wing dissapears apon impact. other vidios of same shot have blackened colored in smoke and edited "plane" i believe this is a rare undoctored shot , it shows how low the fire was in north tower and why all hli shots would not show this object from this low southrn location.

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (June 16, 2008 at 6:40 pm)

from a boat

IRSFRAUDEXPOSED (June 16, 2008 at 6:39 pm)

looks like left wing drawn on missle dissapears on impact?

mattedwards33 (May 26, 2008 at 8:13 pm)

that's odd, considering you can get PHONES with 2.0-5megapixel cameras, which have video recording functions, and if i'm lying, you explain :)

DianitaStar88 (May 2, 2008 at 8:39 am)

funny lol

DigitalCamera0 (March 30, 2008 at 6:14 am)

That's an interesting angle of flight 175 crashing into the South Tower. I've seen various angles,stills etc but this is compelling shot.