|
wildkid911 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They used to put turbos in F1 back in the 1980s but the rules changed and now the rules restricts using turbos , saying the engine should be "Natural aspiration"
korslaagen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
because f1 engine is real power
SSSSBBBB81 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well the new engines are V8 so I guess this vid is at least 3 or 4 years old.and no I would'nt buy the faster car. I would still take the Swapped S2000 because it's a Honda
ayan5769 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
why f1 engine don't need a turbo?
r4c3r10970 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hey fuckbags can we all get alone
Lalann (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That things a v10. You could buy a faster car for how much that motor costs. Im thinkin close to a million
driftingcavalier (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yea ok what ever dude
SSSSBBBB81 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It would be fun to drop something like this in an S2000. I don't know if the engine bay would be large enought tho. But still, it's like a 2.4 liter V8.Stick a Rev limiter on that thing and then the S2000 would be a total rocket.
SSSSBBBB81 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yes, around 19000RPM compared to about 5000RPM maximum for an american production V8
dhmancam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I wasnt..but why not? Theres nothing special about them. Anybody could build one. there slow, loud and boring. | 
