jedimouse (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That is exactly correct. You have learned something new.

ChupacabraYetiElmo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

She is disrespecting the process, the same thing she demands from him. So, evidently it is ok to disrespect the process as a judge but as a person who is expecting to get justice, if they disrepsect the process then they can be belittled by the hypocrite judge who disrespects the process.

deburteaga (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I have to go to work now, so I'm gonna stop replying. My only comment to you is this:Before making assumptions, don't place all women into one general category. Unless you show me how this is true, I'm gonna take it as what you THINK is the case. I feel like you're having a conversation with an imaginary woman who wants to scream at you, yet is innocent and sweet, and expects you to not yell back because she'll call you abusive. OK...whatever.

jedimouse (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

She gave her ruling. She has no duty to give a rebuttal when someone who SHOULD know how to act in a courtroom chooses not to. You are making dumb arguments and being arrogant and chauvinistic, but it would be WRONG of me to say you are acting "just like a man". So let's extend the same courtesy to women, k? She can talk down to him. He's an educated man who SHOULD know the legal system and how to behave, and he obviously chose not to. She did not cross any lines, in my POV.

ChupacabraYetiElmo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Putting a court room on tv for entertainment is disrespecting the process, Verdict guilty>>> hypocrite.. down comes the Gavel Bang!

ChupacabraYetiElmo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It is her attitude, she storms off at the end just like a female in an arguement, because that is how females argue, they storm off and give you no rebuttal, because their arguement is immediate and always correct. For her to say that we are to respect the process and then to make a mockery of the process by sensationalizing it for tv is sort of a hypocrisy don't you think?

jedimouse (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

. . . she is in a position of authority. She is the judge. What are f-ing retarded? She can voice her judgements [sic] all she wants, and tell who to speak and when they can speak. It's her courtroom. She is the authority figure therein. Obviously, you have no legal training and learned English as a second or third language, so this may be lost on you.

ChupacabraYetiElmo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That is my point exactly, the female of america thinks that she has every right to voice her judgements and she well does but if the man voices his judgement, then she calls it abusive and mean and violent and patriarchal. If you want to argue then let's get it on but don't you think for a second I'm gonna back down just becasue you are sweet and innocent and I should just let you have your way, that wouldn't be very equal would it?

sheldonshel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Now Nucka,say suttin else!!,huh?,what?,I didn't hear you!,That's What I thought,verdict for the plaintiff(Gavel Bangs)

jedimouse (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I would like to point out that. . . UMiami's law school is kind of a huge joke. . . I mean, she went to Georgetown and graduated with honors, while he. . . went to UMiami. This isn't a huge surprise.