Search:






black jack gambling online gambling bonus online casino gambling directory online game gambling casino internet gambling poker online free gambling gambling zone nevada gambling gambling tip sports book gambling reno gambling best gambling site basketball gambling poker gambling game real gambling online casino gambling sports betting secure online casino gambling atlantic city gambling gambling cards gambling online virtual nfl gambling gambling general online betting sports gambling internet gambling site online casino slot gambling gambling bet internet online gambling gambling gamble links gambling football online gambling baseball gambling online gambling addiction internet casion gambling gambling schools online gambling portal gambling casino online bonus free online casino gambling casino gambling bet gambling on line cyber gambling online gambling game on line casino gambling gambling sport casino secure online gambling internet gambling casino

Flight 175 - Impossible speed

{site_title}
{site_title} {site_title}
{site_title}

Here is a clip confirming what Joseph Keith had already established, That flight 175 could not have possibly travelled anywhere near 500 MPH at 700ft altitude. Verified by Boeing spokeswoman Leslie Hazzard and Boeing engineer Lori Bechtold. http://www.pumpitout.com--

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: pumpitout

Length: 06:25
Rating: 4.43
Views: 64641

Tags: 11  175  911  flight  september  wtc  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

machfron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The air is three times as dense at 1000 feet when compared to typical cruising altitudes.
guitmarc54 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wake up fellow stupid Americans! 9/11 was an inside job! We elected obama, big deal, he is not the solution, but a placebo...reinvestigate 9/11! We must demand the governmet to reexamine the facts... all the facts... dont let this become another JFK cover up!
chrisswansea2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There's that word again, naive. Limited vocabulary on display here. No, I don't swallow what the media chucks out. Watching it live was enogh for me. Sweeping generalisations are too easy. Being jealous of lots of friends? Where you also jealous of people who got laid before you too?
bweazel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
susceptible to conspiracy theories? is that something you're proud of? that's pretty funny you say it like that though. I think it's pretty easy to flip that around and say people that trust everything they hear and see, have too many friends to keep count of, and naive are most at risk to actually trust the bullshit the corporate media says. but hey. agree to disagree right? i also like that saying, 85% of statistics are made up on the spot : )
chrisswansea2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Naive is word batted around on here a lot. Really it just comes down to not being susceptible to conspiracy theories. Psychological tests show people who are untrusting, have few friends, are gullible and lack a place in society are most at risk. But hey, that's probably misinformation too. Russia by the way is proposing to drill under the arctic to position itself when the middle east starts to run dry.
bweazel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i'm sure to you, it's about as fun as being willfully ignorant and naive. oh don't forget too prideful to say you've been duped. : ]nuking disney land. haha. ya! fuck mickey! Real oil in russia's hands? hmmm. where'd you get that info?
chrisswansea2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
How about nuking Disneyland. The real oil is in Russian hands now anyway, and the gas for that matter. Shame the US has already played they're trump card with WTC. No war with Russia then. Wow, this making stuff up is fun. Can see why you guys do it.
bweazel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and no one is talking about the x-files or the matrix. i know the world is painful. so don't preach to me. you are naive and some day you'll wake up to that fact. so please. other than, the statue of liberty, what other way could you get an apathetic country, to FULLY support an invasion of afghanistan and iraq, don't forget it also needs to be something painful enough to usher in a new era of diminishing civil liberties AND painful enough that american's won't care if you stay in iraq for good.
bweazel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hahaha. ok man. if you say so. is that the best you could do? terrorists destroy the statue of liberty and america wants REVENGE. haha. sure sure. somehow i don't think that would have the affect required. remember your history. 2000+ die on the lusitania, america goes to war, 2000+ die at pearl harbor, america goes to war, 2000+ die on 9/11, america goes to war. starting to see a pattern? our government may have not set all these up, but they sure didn't do much to stop them.
chrisswansea2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This isn't the X-files or the Matrix. Real life is boring and painful. There are plenty of ways that America could have staged a reason to invade without murdering thousands of its own people or destroying most of New York's business district. American's would have wanted vengence if they had blown up the Statue of Liberty.




Gambling Gamble | Casino Gambling Bet | - Flight 175 - Impossible speed

Website © Copyright 2007 - All Rights Reserved
Videos © Copyright by Respective Owners